Monday, 12 December 2011

Hunsett Mill, Norfolk

Something impressive about the simplicity of this low energy conversion or extension [what do you call it whenever the new build is larger than the house?] by acme architects. Mostly we like it because it demonstrates the flexibility and low impact of modern methods of construction and how considering the method of construction for a one-off property might still make you think about quality control and standards that you can achieve within a factory setting.

Sunday, 4 December 2011

Alex Hartley's Geodesic Dome

Artist Alex Hartley blurs the line between installation and life in his use of a geodesic dome that is full of retro references to hippy lifestyles for the 1970s. Look out for his work as part of the Cultural Olympiad next year.

Sunday, 20 November 2011

Futuro House

This is just the most inspiring [and pedantic] site for homage to pre fab architecture in the form of the Futuro House. It is a design classic and really needs a fresh look at updating for the 21st Century.

180 Year Old Toy Train

The story is of a father and a son living in a property backing onto the Stockton to Darlington Railway that opened in 1825. A toy was modeled on the passing trains from old bits of scrap wood and somehow it has survived around 6 generations of children playing with it. Now it has shown up on the BBC's Antiques Roadshow.

Friday, 18 November 2011

Think Low Carbon Centre

In a partnership with the BRE, Barnsley College is setting out on a programme of new build sustainable housing and retrofit in an interesting collaboration between modern methods of construction, supply chain, skills providers, construction industry and hopefully some interesting designers. The process sounds more innovative that the video but all worthy.

Sunday, 13 November 2011

Retro Architectural Modeling

Image advertising a new architectural modeling system from 1931. A kind of retro-revit? Makes you question whether we are still allowing our modeling systems and software to restrict our approach and process to design.

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

Banksy does Moneybags

Don't you just wish you had thought of it first? Just goes to show that anti-capitalism can be funny when making a point. Now what we need is someone to make a monopoly hotel tent to go with the game ... although for a more informed understanding of why social protest is happening where and how, have a read of Anna Minton's blog - save you paying for the Guardian this week.

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

Feats per minute

A vinyl player that requires you to cycle at the appropriate speed to get the best from it. Very cool idea. Find out more here.

Wednesday, 28 September 2011

Happy Birthday Christiania

Christiania turns 40 this month and has been subject to a radio 4 review. Catch it while you can.

Saturday, 3 September 2011

Pixel Post-it note Art

Have too much time on your hands at work during the current recession? Have a draw full of post-it notes? Why not have a look at post-it war and be inspired to your own creations ... cheaper than space invader tiles ...

Sunday, 28 August 2011

I Love Park Hill

A 1980's icon - not Park Hill [although that isn't a bad icon in itself], but the graffiti plastered on the concrete to be visible from the city centre. Recently subject to a radio show all of it's own. Now lit up in neon for all to still see - probably the nicest and most humane touch of the reinvention of Park Hill.

Friday, 26 August 2011

Alien Architecture

There have been a couple of articles recently that have caught my eye regarding sci-fi architecture and climate change. The headline "Cut carbon to avoid alien attack, says NASA" is based on the observable scale of the impact of environmental change and one possible scenario for meeting extraterrestrials. The mothership in Cowboys and Aliens description ... "... it's a great big lump of a thing; it looks like the multi-storey car park in Get Carter, designed for throwing dodgy Newcastle businessmen to their deaths."
And I think the new Business School for Newcastle University has been inspired by the Star Wars Sandcrawler ... even down to the cladding.

References: Sample, Ian [2011] "Cut carbon to avoid alien attack, says NASA". p19 and Bradshaw, Peter [2011] "Gunfight at the ET corral". p12 both in The Guardian 19th August.

Friday, 19 August 2011

Wiki House

You have to have a look at this! The Wiki House is another great look into the future of the house building industry? Printed rather than prefabricated building elements taken from an open-source kit of parts. Nice idea, although it would probably need a lot of support. Not just a technical factory but some way to overcome the barriers to delivery - statutory planning, financing and mortgage providers, insurance, reselling, occupant preferences ... etc. Yet the principle is great ... free access to design. Just let's not forget about local variety and identity as this develops into something bigger.

Wednesday, 3 August 2011

Milton Keynes Methods of Construction

Recently can across this oldish article on Richard Rodgers & Partners MMC 'Design for Manufacture Project' at Oxley Woods, Milton Keynes. Designed for an above-ground cost of £60,000 ... or $118,000. They seem impressed by the cost, the speed and the Ref: Blum, Andrew [2008] "7 Days Later" Wired, June p86.

Monday, 25 July 2011

BREEAM Sustainable Communities

News that Malmo Western Harbour has just been awarded the first BREEAM Sustainable Communities Standard outside of the UK and I have mixed views about the award of a badge of sustainability. The mixed perspective is due to the need for branding on top of the expo credentials and the actual investment, including the cost, of gaining such a 'brand' badge. It should be a positive step to set an objective standard for area based sustainability but it does seem to conflict with LEED ND standard, which is in effect a more co-operative standard. A good thing if you are the BRE but important to remember there are other sustainability badges and franchises.

Reference: Young, Karen [2011] "Assessing the Sustainability of a Major Swedish Development" Constructing the Future, Summer 48 p13.

Off Sites: Spaces of Possibility

Urban planners have an existing concept around Third Place Theory where public arts venues fit into a wider theory. Basically, first place is 'home', second place is 'work' and the third places are ...? And here you enter into a simple set of rules about what are the essential and desirable components of a 'third place'. In practice these turn out to be beer gardens,public houses, pavement cafes as well as the art gallery and public spaces. They are places where the different members of the community can hang out. The rules [according to Oldenburg] of 'Third Places' are free and open public access on neutral ground to somewhere the principle purpose is conversation, debate and exchange of ideas. At a local level some of these rules have made in into formal policy and practice - one example is the promotion of 'Neutral Spaces' in contested public areas in Belfast. And a lot has been written [best account by Anna Minton] around the
trend to privatise the so-called public realm and gated communities. From these rules it is clear that not every public space is neutral or even public. It also seems significant that digital exclusion makes web spaces more exclusive then they need to be, and social networking has a geography very different to any individual city.
The challenges seem to be for creative individuals and arts collectives to explore how they can use non-gallery spaces more effectively. While there are recognizable trends for pop-up shops, theatre, cinema and gallery space, these are still based on a update of an existing and widely recognized concept of a shop, theatre, cinema etc....

Off site galleries have the potential to be more than galleries. What is preventing a building or space already occupied from extending the current use into that of an art gallery? Or visa versa? Interested to look at the possibilities and support the debate.

References: Oldenburg Ray [1989] The Great Good Place [Marlowe & Company, New York]. Gaffikin, Frank et al. [2008] Public Space for a Shared Belfast: A research report for Belfast City Council. Minton, Anna [2009] Ground Control: Fear and happiness in the twenty-first century city [Penguin, London].

Wednesday, 20 July 2011

Architects of Air

Traffic Barrier Seating

I'm not really sure where this is from and who made it ... but nice and simple enough as to not require any instructions if you want to make your own.

Saturday, 16 July 2011

Leo Fitzmaurice

While the idea of deconstructed packets by artist Leo Fitzmaurice made me smile, the purpose behind it is as to the point as any art can be. In the words of Robert Clark ... "This is the kind of daft thing artists do: adapting the cast-offs of consumer culture through a process of determined and obsessive repetition to an agenda that is all the more delightful for being so utterly futile". [Ref: Guardian Guide 16-22 July 2011 p36].

Friday, 15 July 2011

Junction Box Art

Nice article about Leeds Junction boxes that make sense of some of the images we shot last week or so in Leeds City Centre. Download a map of the locations here.

Sunday, 3 July 2011

Allotment Art

Have a look at this article for a look at more images of art based on an allotment. Strong images of an attractive do-it-yourself lifestyle.


Interesting movement in political messages in a creative manner on the streets of Kabul. This seems to be the real point of public art - in seeking to promote debate in an alternative way. Much better than political posters on lamp-posts. Reference; Burke, Jason [2011] "Grafitti guerrillas: Kabul's writing on the walls". Guardian 13th June p19.

Monday, 27 June 2011

Metatron's Cube

When I first saw this image by Michael Paukner I though it was an art print based on Central Place Theory. Turns out it is Metatron's Cube, something of a sacred geometry behind the Giant's Causeway and other naturally occurring phenomena. For the record, Central Place Theory looks like this ...

Salford Lads Club

Remembering a classic shot by Stephen Wright from the inside of "The Queen is Dead". Nothing new about this except that I've just discovered the shot is now part of the National Portrait Gallery ... the 3rd most iconic location in the country by popular vote and listed by English Heritage [love to look at the listing in detail to find out how important The Smiths were in making it happen].

Sunday, 26 June 2011

Yellow Shutters

A simple floor plan of three different house types on each storey have been combined with one of the most elegant facades that I have seen for a long time. Always nice when it gets built and it looks like the initial drawings. Cost effect and cleaver use of colour to establish a strong identity. More on the development at 2+1 officina architettura.

Visualising Sustainability

A range of different definitions of sustainability that have attracted our attention .... visualising sustainability using a couple of Venn diagrams through to retro ethical diagrams pretending to simplify the world system in one page ... worth an exploration to reassure you there is nothing new under the sun ...

Virtual Band

Tuesday, 7 June 2011

Creative Stuff

The purpose of a small debate held at CultureLab OnSite last week was to rethink the approach to public art - commissioning, curating and producing.

One of the ways the discussion responded was in highlighting distinctions between 'art' and 'public art' and the underlying key performance indicators [KPIs]. Thinking about KPIs for art forces us to think about the type of output and outcomes that are required as part of a public art project. On reflection, this idea actually translated well into the work of the individual artists and the work put into the initial brief and commission. So, the key idea was that [1] public art commissions have a different starting point from 'art' in that they are driven by outputs and outcomes that are in some manner 'measurable'.

At a basic level, public art has to have some measurables, be it the number of visits to museums or the percentage of people enlightened by the work or the percentage improvement on levels of visual conginance - whatever the sense of the measure, ther always seems to have to be a measure in order to justisify the investment of time, money and resources. We have to be able to audit the investment put into public art and provide some justification. There were some concerns that actually ignoring this point and lacking empirical [for this 'economic'] justification for the arts is one of the reasons behind the current level of cuts. Any suggestions for national indicators for the arts would be useful - one recent write up suggested the most common web searches, that results in Banksy being the most popular artist in the world. Or what about the resale value value of the work - a case for Hirst?

Given this starting point, the next question was [2] how do we do more with less? And in so doing, help to justify investment in the arts. One of the reasons behind the recent collaboration between the local authority and the University, was exactly addressing this - how do we make more of what we have within the existing public art collection within the city and get more people involved? Having a target group in mind was a strong starting point, with students apprecipating the requirement to undertake background market research with their choice of 'public' to ensure what they are proposing is about public outputs rather than the personal outcomes that every artist has.

Enlightened self-interest in building a body of work within public art should always require a different method of working that is centered around the target audience. One of the key observations on the above distinction, was that the medium is not the message. Those artists who focus on a media, in many of these projects it was about the technology, tended to miss the target group and outcomes.

The next area explored was [3] how the creative element, the ideas, fitted into public art commissions? An equation emerged suggesting that "Public Art = Idea + audience + funding" - or put another way, "Public Art = Creativity + market research + business plan". In both of these thoughts, public art does appear to more than just art within a public location. It has at heart, a different audience in mind. Whether individual works actually hit their target audience is actually an experiment in market testing. But at least the public audience are always clear within the brief.

Wednesday, 1 June 2011


So, this new photo rendering package fakes a tilt shift lens and claims to make your images look like models. My first go with an image of the new pedestrian scheme in Northumberland Road, Newcastle looks very impressive [as a first go] ... all very interesting but go me thinking if tilt shifting your models would make them look even more like a model?

Sunday, 29 May 2011

Street Street Art

Classic iconography slightly reinvented and put back onto the street ... I like the idea that you can visit the entire 'set' around the streets of Miami. Every city should have one.

Wednesday, 11 May 2011

Iconic Site

I've seen this project a few times and this location reminds me of the final rooftop fight scene in Highlander ... still love the idea by sans facon that challenges clients on regeneration and reuse.

Tuesday, 10 May 2011

Title Deed

Another lovely example of monopoly iconography put into public art as one of the most meaningful and visual forms of property and finance. Make it big and make it green. Work is by Canadian artist An Te Liu.

Monday, 9 May 2011

Community Memorial

Collaborative work between artist, Maggie Smith, and Cutler Anderson Architects. Nice simple idea of real life and real people becoming an interactive memorial and artwork. Came across this example when thinking about how individual thoughts can be collected together to create a greater and more significant whole. It is the Armed Forces Memorial at Norfolk, Virginia. Reference: Kennedy et al [2008] The Best of Culter Anderson Architects [Rockport, Beverly].

Thursday, 28 April 2011

No Impact Man - The Movie

Have a watch at ... No Impact Man - 1 Translation(s) | dotSUB ... and think about how it makes you think ... trying to live according to your values.

Monday, 25 April 2011

Box House

Just a really simple collaboration between artist and architect ... much more attractive form of shed design.

Wednesday, 16 March 2011

A Framework for Standards for the North East

There are recent questions and much professional outrage over the public subsidy given for poor quality housing as part of the HCA Kickstart programme, with Housing Minister Grant Shapps stating that... 'Government needs to lead by example'(1) relation to this Kickstart programme. Yet in another statement Shapps has stated that ' is an unfair and unnecessary expense for developers to require additional building standards for public build, at a time when the country desperately needs to build more homes'.(2)

This is just part of the current paradox evident in the resulting discussions and implications that we should lower the minimum quality standards for housing in order to stimulate the level of activity within the housing market. While we wait for central government and quango guidance, built professionals are left with a set of inherited and sometimes contradictory standards(3) that have in effect been developed for different reasons, by different organisations, with different statutory status and just package together. Indeed, a '... [c]lose examination of recent housing quality standards indicates a tendency to adopt a piecemeal approach that relies on outdated data sources and references... [a] process of cobbling together existing standards.'(4)

Yet this paradox isn't new. Since the formation of the Homes and Communities Agency there has been a constant tension between the slightly conflicting remits of promoting quality and sustainability through the inherited design standards of English Partnerships, and the delivery of housing completions against Housing Corporation indicators. Despite the evidence that housing quality has historically been higher and benefits from voluntary and organisational standards(5), on balance there still appears to be an obsession with housing numbers(6) and using the confusing term 'delivery' as a trump card rather than quality, giving the impression that making something or anything happen today is always better than waiting for the right quality development to happen at a later date. This empirical and short term emphasis has continued within the north east(7); although some localised studies(8) within the region's communities show that qualitative issues such as flexibility, size, security and build quality are significant differentials between developments within a neighbourhood, with most having a minimum level of 'expected' standards on energy performance and public realm quality at the same time. Yet the normative bias continues in almost every scheme where short term thinking, suggesting that development quality costs, continually results in watered down proposals.

Nationally the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment has argued for consistency over a basic minimum level of quality(9) and, in a considered response to the impact of the credit crunch on the house building industry(10), made significant points around the unique nature of the housing product as part of a localised 'community' market that operates imperfectly due to limited choice and variations over individuals' understanding and definition[s] of quality.

Another paradox of the housing industry is the rational and normative models that are used to explain irrational markets. CABE's arguments that quality pays for itself over time are well made and repeated at the national and regional level(11).

Yet the lack of investment in the quality and sustainability of development within the north east suggests that this message has been ignored, or has been unconvincing evidence for developers with a short term remit - the same reasons of long term maintenance costs and liability seems to justify why public sector standards have been consistently higher.

Yet in spite of the complex and sometimes conflicting nature of housing standards and the prevalent view that they are simply an additional and unnecessary cost for every stage of operation within development industry, there has to be a view that having them, even in imperfect form, is better than not having them?

So why not take the government at face value and trust that they are interested in simplified and integrated design and sustainability standards that are supported by every sector of the construction industry? One response to this position would be to bring forward a framework for regional standards within the North East. The starting point for discussions for such a framework is a set of draft rules informed by a mix of recent ministerial statements relating to housing design standards and by comparative approaches, most significantly being the CNU inspired Hope VI programme(12). This was translated within the UK context as the Mixed Communities Initiative(13) and even included a first phase case study at South Bank in Redcar and Cleveland proving it is both relevant and transferable to the north east. It is similar to the high level approach recently established within the Tees Valley(14) that explicitly links economic realities; in the form of long term social, environmental and economic value; within the functional requirements for new housing development. Any framework has to be about getting the basic principles correct and working from there rather than simply redrafting and rehashing the mixed set of existing standards we already have, and where necessary fitting these to the region or sub region. This doesn't mean we should ignore what we already have but that it should be revised on the basis of the fit with some commonly shared set of principles.

Hope VI Principles for the North East of England Region

As a starting point, I would propose a broad scope of factors and rules that has to be addressed within any set of regional design principles. These can in turn form the basis for a mix of substantive and procedural standards.

Rule 1 Co-Design

Development has to meet end-users requirements. There should be explicit consideration of options for more clearly defining the end-user requirements through involvement in the drafting of the project brief through to potential for active community planning at concept design, options testing and detailed proposal stages. There should be close working with the end-user [often but not always the client] to get the parameters of the brief right, to test the concepts and review the detailed designs directly with them. This approach should be in addition to effectively using the existing evidence(15) provided by post occupancy evaluation on the requirements for both new housing and neighbourhoods. This is inherently a two-way dialogue that begins with a good collaborative project and continues post-construction. The starting point is to get the brief right at the start.

Rule 2 Integrated Design

Design and developments should be progressed by working together with the right team. Proposals should be developed in cooperation with house builders, designers and partners within the extended supply chains. The technical requirements of sustainability have set new challenges for the construction and development industry(16) that are relevant to both new build and retrofit projects(17) that require a refreshed approach to collaborative working. There should be key benefits and increased synergy whenever salespeople become part of an integrated design team and understand how their products will be used and how they fit within the shared project aims.

Rule 3 Affordable Design

Proposals have to be realistic and affordable. Information from housing needs and affordability can provide the basis for linked financial products as well as for setting a price target for sale or for letting. It is too simplistic to consider issues of affordability by reducing building costs or using subsidised land. The fresh thinking on affordability(18) measured against local incomes should be linked to creative financial products that consider wider neighbourhood issues such as the availability or affordability of public transport and specific energy consumption costs, as part of a more realistic consideration of disposable household income that has benefits for more sustainable, better quality and better located developments. Perhaps this could link to more radical green investment ideas(19) for the use of patient public and private money in the provision of 'transition' homes.

Rule 4 Quality Design

Developments should be well built with good quality materials, detailing and finishing. Quality isn't necessarily about style. This sounds common sense but it does require thinking around design detailing, specifications and then build quality through the construction stages. So ideally this approach should be reflected in the monitoring and assessment of the build quality, with appropriate use of a clerk of works and post completion monitoring.

Rule 5 Sustainable Design

Developments should respond to the sustainability requirements at household and neighbourhood scale as set out by the Code for Sustainable Homes(20), building regulations and other statutory requirements, including consideration over resilience to change and potential responses to climate adaptation(21). This would integrate existing standards including BREEAM Eco Homes for retrofit properties with the use of Housing Corporation HQI/ Scheme Development Standards. We know that sustainability is a lot more than energy and differs between scales and locations so where better based models exist already, these can usefully substitute or add to the underlying evidence for issues of energy, waste, water and healthy living.

Rule 6 Long-term Design

Work should be undertaken with an understanding of the long-term management arrangements for the proposals. It is also consistent with the concept of 'patient money'(22) arising out of the lifetime cost consideration on higher returns, reduced void periods and reduced maintenance costs. This is about creating a long-term legacy that benefits from the right sort of upfront capital investment and avoids the multiple cost of bad design(23). This should also be reflected in the understanding issues of flexibility and durability over the life of any development and support for approaches that extend the life and avoid redundancy, including consideration of existing Inclusive and flexible design principles(24) / Lifetime Homes(25) and internal spacing standards.

This set of principles, or charter for standards is a starting point. It sets out what should be the scope of integrated design standards. To add more detail to this will require the different sectors and stages of the construction industry to collaborate and work together.

1. Quoted in; Hurst, Will [2010] 'HCA forced to reveal details of poor housing'. Building Design 3rd December. Download from
3. Position statement of Home and Communities Agency at The scope of standards and evidence of broad consultation base undertaken by the Homes and Communities Agency has been published in; Electoral Reform Services [January 2011] Report for: Proposed Core Housing Design and Sustainability Standards Consultation: Prepared for the Homes and Communities Agency [ERS Research Services, London].
4. p739 in; Milner, Jo and Madigan, Ruth [2004] 'Regulation and Innovation: Rethinking 'Inclusive' Housing Design'. Housing Studies 19[5] pp 727-744.
5. HCA and CABE [April 2009] Affordable Housing Survey: A review of the quality of affordable housing in England [Homes and Communities Agency, London].
6. Housing Commission [November 2010] Housing shortages: what Councils can do. Final report presented to the Department for Communities and Local Government and to the Local Government Group; albeit with explicit support for the growing importance self build and community land trusts.
7. Bramley, Glen and Watkins, David [January 2008] Modelling Future Housing Markets: Final Report for Bridging NewcastleGateshead by School of the Built Environment, Heriot-Watt University and Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
8. Bridging NewcastleGateshead [January 2010] The relative values of design in Walker Riverside [Bridging NewcastleGateshead, Newcastle].
9. CABE [2010] Simpler and better: Housing design in everyone's interest [Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, London].
10. Simmons, Richard [2009] No more toxic assets [Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, London].
11. Similar efforts have been made within the North East to support such arguments and provide the evidence for investment in quality and sustainability. Fairhurst [January 2009] Value in Design: maximising the value of new residential environments [Bridging NewacstleGateshead, Newcastle upon Tyne]. This can be downloaded from Colin Buchanan and Llewelyn Davies Yeang [2008] Capturing the impacts of quality of place investments. Final report for regional development agency One North East. Llewelyn Davies Yeang [2007] Shaping the Norths Cities for Growth: An Agenda for the Next Decade. Final report for The Northern Way. Report and supporting case studies can be downloaded from Tribal Urban Studio, ARUP and CFURS [May 2009] The Northern Way: Residential futures [The Northern Way, Newcastle].
12. Congress for the New Urbanism and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development [2000] Principles for Inner City Neighbourhood Design: Hope VI and the New Urbanism [Congress for the new Urbanism, San Francisco]. Available for download from
13. The idea set out in; Berube, A [2005] Mixed Communities in England: A US Perspective On Evidence and Policy Prospects [Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York]; with the results of the demonstration projects have been published in; Communities and Local Government [March 2009] Evaluation of the Mixed Communities Initiative Demonstration Projects: Initial Report: Baseline and Early Process Issues [Communities and Local Government, London].
14. Tees Valley Unlimited [2011] 'Design, Heritage and Sustainability in Tees Valley - A guide for future housing' [Tees Valley Unlimited, Middlesbrough].
15. CABE [2005] What it's like to live there: the views of residents on the design of new housing [Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, London].
16. Recent sector review and collation of advice can be found in; HM Government [November 2010] Low Carbon Construction: Innovation and Growth Team Final Report [Department of Business, Innovation and Skills; London]. Download from
17. Honour, J [October 2010] Sustainable housing refurbishment: An update on current guidance and sources of information [Building Research Establishment, Watford].
18. Annex B of; Communities and Local Government [June 2010] Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3) Housing [TSO, Norwich].
19. Green Investment Bank Commission [June 2010] Unlocking investment to deliver Britain's low carbon future: Report by the Green Investment Bank Commission [Green Investment Bank Commission, London].
20. Department for Communities and Local Government [December 2006] Code for Sustainable Homes: a step change in sustainable home building practice [DCLG, London].
21. Gething, Bill [2010] Design for future climate: Opportunities for adaptation in the built environment [Technology Strategy Board, Swindon]; and Shaw, R; Colley, M and Connell, R [2007] Climate Change Adaptation by Design: A Guide for Sustainable Communities [Town and Country Planning Association, London].
22. p118 in Roger Evan Associates [2007] Delivering Quality Places: Urban Design Compendium 2 [English Partnership & Housing Corporation, London].
23. CABE [2006] The cost of bad design [Commission for Architecture and th Built Environment, London].
24. Adapted from; Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment [2006] The principles of inclusive design: They include you [CABE, London].
25. Initially promoted in; Lifetime Homes Group [1993] Lifetime Homes [Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York]; and Carrol, C., Cowans, J and Darton, D [1999] Meeting Part M and Designing Lifetime Homes [Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York].

Tuesday, 15 March 2011


The Forty Part Motet
[A reworking of “Spem in Alium” by Thomas Tallis 1573]
fourty Voices, fourty Speakers and Castle Keep, 2001
Janet Cardiff [b1957]

[1] Berwick, Carley [2006] “Forty Harmonius Voices Drown Out Your Woes: Cardiff at MoMa”.


Queen Victoria
bronze and pink granite, 1903
Alfred Gilbert [1854-1934]

Twenty one foot high sculpture comprising base, figure and canopy adjacent to St Nicholas’ Cathedral in St Nicholas Square. The neo-baroque canopy is an attempt to reflect the canopy of the adjacent cathedral lantern. Erected as a gift by Sir William Haswell Stephenson, Mayor of the City of Newcastle

[1] Most famous for ‘Eros’, Piccadilly Circus London [1886-1907] his imaginative and dreamlike work has been liken to that of Gilbert and George; by Cumming, Laura [2011] “Modern British Sculpture”. The Observer Review, 23rd January; forming part of the 2011 Exhibition of Modern British Sculpture at the Royal Academy, London being shown alongside work by Henry Moore and Damien Hurst.
[2] p28 Ayris, Ian; Jubb, Peter; Palmer, Steve and Usherwood, Paul [1996] A Guide to the Public Monuments & Sculpture of Tyne and Wear [Specialist Conservation Team, Development Department, Newcastle upon Tyne City Council].


Cardinal George ‘Basil’ Hume
Bronze [2002]
Nigel Boonham [b1953]

A 7m high figure located within a memorial garden
[1], Neville Street, outside of St Mary’s Cathedral. It was unveiled in May 2002 by Her Majesty The Queen in the year of the Golden Jubilee.
[1] The artist’s own writing on the memorial garden and the statue can be read at